Should the government be able to secretly monitor suspicious individuals? (4B)
Yes
Side Score: 18
Winning Side! |
![]() |
No
Side Score: 2
|
|
|
i think she should be able to. ONLY if they have a criminal record prior to them thinking they are a suspect. if they have done something bad before then they are at a higher chance to do something bad again. so they should me monitored and watched to look out for the safety of others. Side: yes
1
point
1
point
1
point
1
point
I think that they should monitor people who are suspicious because it could save alot of lives. Like if someone was trying to bomb the airport or something, if we had their phone tapped or somone watching them then it could prevent them from doing that. But people who are not suspicious should have their privacy. Side: yes
1
point
I think they should ONLY monitor the people that have comitted a major crime before. If someone has done something major to threaten someone, or some place than they should be monitored, then again, the government might start taking advantage of that and try to monitor everyone.. Side: yes
I think that the government should be allowed to secretly monitor suspicious activity because it may most likely be to protect the country or its citizens. if someone if being monitored then that means that they obviously have something that to hide that the government wants to find out. Most of people who are monitored are probably suspected terrorists so in order to prevent another attack, the government wants to assure that this person is or isnt a terrorist. There are also other occasions in which someone cane be responsible for selling narcotics, weapons or are responsible for murder. If this is the case then of course the government has the right to monitor them so that way they can gather up enough evidence against the victims to put them away and keeping them out of the streets, keeping it safe. Side: yes
|
|